VERDICT EXTRA Essay Extra Duranbah Road, Duranbah NSW 2487, AUSTRALIA June
1998
On Deism, Pantheism and Name Calling
Great truths are generally paradoxical. The reality of God is no exception. God is both transcendent and immanent.
God's transcendence means that God is above, outside, other than, bigger than, and separate from creation and every other reality. He is beyond the capacity of our imagination and reason and cannot be contained in any theory.
Transcendence is the basis of the monotheism of the Old Testament. The Hebrews believed that God was essentially so invisible and incomprehensible that even his name was written without vowels and in a form that was unpronounceable (YHWY).
God's immanence means that God is everywhere present within his creation to sustain and give life to every creature. That's why the monotheists of the Old Testament likened God to the wind which was everywhere. In Hebrew the words air, wind and spirit all come from the same word ruach. Thus the creation myth says God breathed into Adam's nostrils the ruach of life and he became a living soul. Job also says that as long as breath is in me, the spirit of God is in my nostrils. Every living thing is said to be sustained by God's ruach. If he stays his hand that is to say, withdraws his spirit, the man or whatever the creature returns to the dust and the ruach returns to God who gave it.
God is a mighty spirit who is everywhere. So Hagar found as she waited to die with her infant son, but discovered, "God is present to see me". And Jacob dreamed that he was surrounded by God's presence.
The Old Testament Psalmist said there was no escape from God's presence.
"If I ascend up to heaven you are there, and if I make my bed down in the realm of the dead you are there. If I, take the wings of the morning, fly into the uttermost parts of the sea, you are still there to sustain me." (Psalm 139)
The New Testament also speaks of God as the light which lights every person who is born (John 1) and as a reality who is manifested even in those who do not acknowledge him (Romans 1). As Paul said to the Athenians, (quoting their own poets) "we are his offspring" and again "he is not far from every one of us".
Even leading scientists and physicists today are acknowledging that mere laws of physics or laws of natural selection can't explain the mysteries of evolution or quantum physics. (see Paul Davies, 'The Mind of God')
Immanence means within. God is within his' Creation. Even evil doers are dependent borrowers of life from God and are subjects of his care.
All good monotheism holds to both transcendence and immanence. Transcendence without immanence is what is called Deism, a view held by many of the great philosophers and liberals of the 18th century. The Deists said that God was like the great watchmaker who having made the earth and put his Laws in effect, left it like and absentee landlord. Deism tends to be cold and without spirituality. It offers no presence and no fellowship with God. It is sheer, arid intellectualism.
On the other hand immanence without transcendence leads to pantheism. In pantheism, the distinction between God and the Creation is blurred. Pan means all - that is to say - I am God, you are God, or at least, we are all a part of God, and all of Creation added up is God. Pantheism is a tendency of Eastern religions and various forms of mysticism.
Orthodox Christianity no less than Communism was an Absolutist system. In fact, Marxism was actually a take-off or copy of the closed Christian system.
The word idiot comes from the Greek word idios which means a person who thinks for himself. Heresy means having a private opinion that differs from the Church. Thus anyone who thought differently to the tribe, to society, to what was politically or theologically correct came to be called idiots, heretics, deranged, demon possessed and as dangerous as if they had a contagious, death-dealing disease.
Just as doctors give names to various diseases, so the Church labeled the idiots and gave names to heresies - e.g. Judaizers, Gnosticism, Arianism, Sebellianism, Pelegianism, Antinomianism, Modalism, Legalism, Enthusiasm and so on! The quickest way to silence any voice of dissent was to trot out one of these labels and then to pronounce the word loudly in the hearing of others. People would cry "Eek" "Ooh" and run from the person or his idea as if it was leprosy or the bubonic plague.
The same game went on behind the iron and bamboo curtains. Any heresy (departure from straight thinking) was met with cries of "bourgeois revisionism", "capitalist imperialism" etc. That sufficiently short-circuited any creative diversity and got the heretic assigned to a labor camp in Siberia or something worse.
With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Absolutism, the old game of prejudicing arguments by labeling an opponent and scaring the rest is not going to work.
For instance Michael Morwood has written a very challenging, indeed
explosive book called Tomorrow's Catholic - Understanding God and Jesus in a New Millennium. Those who are trying to prejudice others against the book by saying it teaches pantheism are either ignorant or dishonest. I have good reason to suspect that one party, from whom such a label has come, knows what he is up to. He moves and communicates in a circle in which the word pantheism is both poison and anathema. Like a doctor who demonstrates his authority by putting a name to a disease, this party plays his game of labeling a heresy in such a way he will stop people from carefully judging the matter on its merits.
Those who label Michael Morwood's book as pantheism do no credit to themselves as people who are informed or people are interested in fair and honest discussion. In the first part of his book, Morwood writes in the clearest terms about God's transcendence, and thereby lays a foundation which is totally at odds which pantheism. Anyone who calls his teaching pantheism is only looking for an easy handle to justify their prejudice. This kind of cop-out deserves nothing but contempt.
I know this party's game only too well. For a couple of years, his swear word was gnosticism. He found this heretical disease under every rose bush. He suggested that this writer suffered from this contamination, even though this writer at the time was saying (or writing) nothing. But that nonsense, having worn thin, he trots out this new label of pantheism.
This pathetic game is not going to work any more because the wall of Absolutism has collapsed. There is no big TOE - Theory of Everything. This arrogance of sitting on the gate doling out heresy labels or acting and the role of a doctor able to correctly diagnose heresy and identify "idiots" throws no light on anything but the person who plays these games. I will not respond by throwing labels around. But I would suggest more respect for God's transcendence (incomprehensibility) would mean far less presumptuous speculation and abstractions about God's nature either before or after the Christ event.
R. D. Brinsmead
Duranbah Road
DURANBAH NSW 2487
Australia
![]()